Powerful, Enterprise-Grade Event Management Software
Sell tickets & Collect registration fees online
Full-Service Abstract Management Software: Collect ➩ Assign ➩ Review ➩ Decide ➩ Notify
Customizable forms to collect & review abstracts, symposia, proposals & grants
The Complete Event Schedule Builder to Create Virtual & Hybrid Sessions
Create Event Schedule with Slides, Group Chats, Survey forms & more
Engagement Tools to Host Virtual Conferences & Online Community Website
Engage attendees & Produce knowledge with online networking portal
Every conference starts with an idea, and the quality of that idea depends on the abstracts of the program. Abstract submissions determine the relevance and credibility of the event. Opting for an abstract management system is arguably one of the most important decisions you are ever asked to make.
The art of using abstract management systems is knowing what your audiences want. An even more complicated and yet entirely possible task is to determine how many attendees will show up for your event. Yes, the figure is approximate but not speculative. It helps you prepare for your event.
In academic and professional writings and submissions, an abstract plays a very important role. It provides the essence of a research or scientific paper, report, thesis, or presentation. Its main purpose is to give a complete summary or overview of the project to the reader. It gives a glimpse of the objectives, methods, key findings, and conclusions of the study carried out by the scholars.
Handling events in 2026 requires more than just registration and ticketing. Event organizers require tools that combine abstract management, speaker review process management, CRM, and engagement. These tools will enable you to host successful academic, scientific, hybrid, and business events efficiently and effectively.
The peer review system is an integral part of academic conferences, and it helps establish scholarly credibility. It is important to choose the right peer review system that impacts your workflow from abstract submission to making final decisions. This decision paves the way for a proper review to be conducted, and with a proper system, it builds trust between the reviewers and the importance of the event. Continue reading
Academic events depend not only on proper organization but also on a good number of attendees and a proper assessment of the submissions made. In the context of hosting a research conference, a university symposium, or an international meeting of academics, the success of such events relies on having the proper platform, which forms the foundation for their success. Continue reading
You became an academic conference organizer because you believed in bringing researchers together. You wanted to create spaces where abstract ideas could collide and collaborations could form. You saw yourself shaping programs that would contribute to scaling up a field and subsequently, broader mankind.
Organizing a multi-disciplinary event sounds like the most exciting thing in the world initially. The excitement begins to wither as event professionals hit the abstract collection phase. Abruptly, you find yourself drowning in submissions coming in from physicists who use heavy jargon, sociologists who are presenting complex data in patchy paragraphs and artists who are quite literally ‘abstract’ in their submissions.
Reviewer collaboration means experts work together to review the same paper. They share feedback, discuss differences, and agree on a final view of the work. The process often becomes a challenge when teams rely on outdated technology. Many associations still use legacy tools that limit how reviewers share their feedback, assign and track tasks, or stay aligned throughout the review cycle. The outdated systems focus primarily on basic tracking rather than real-time collaboration, thereby decreasing productivity and creating workflow gaps. Continue reading
Every year, conference organizers gather a whole lot of data. Abstracts, papers, author profiles, topic tags, reviewer scores, and session interests all go into the system way before the conference starts. However, what most organizers fail to realize is the power of this data. Abstract submission data is not just a record of abstracts received. It is the loudest signal from your community. It tells what they care about, what they will study next, and how your field might change. Continue reading
Have you ever received a call for papers(CFP) and felt unsure what to send? Lots of authors feel that way. Some teams overload their call for papers with extra details; others create CFPs that don’t include enough details. Many leave out key dates for the event or fail to state its primary purpose clearly. These small mistakes reduce trust and lead to fewer submissions, even when the event itself is solid.
If you’ve been part of academic conferences for a while, you know that managing submissions and reviews can get complex. The peer review component is one of the most important parts of successfully hosting an academic conference. Authors submit their abstracts to be reviewed; reviewers read, score, and share comments for each submission. If the workflow is organized, all parties stay on track. However, when the workflow is disorganized, the entire review process becomes slow and stressful for authors, reviewers, and organizers alike.