Auto-Populate Co-Authors in Abstract Submission System via Database Search

New Co-Author Addition Features in Abstract Submission System

 

Collaboration is the cornerstone of any successful research or academic event. Recognizing this, we're excited to announce a significant update to Dryfta's Abstract Submission System that makes adding co-authors a breeze. This update introduces new options for submitters to add co-authors either by searching our existing database or by manually entering details, or even both. Let's explore how this new feature can enhance your abstract management experience.

Continue reading

AI-Powered Quality Checks & Plagiarism Detection for Abstracts

AI-Powered Quality Checks & Plagiarism Detection
 

We are excited to announce a significant update to Dryfta’s abstract management system. This update revolutionizes the way abstract submissions are managed, making the process more streamlined, error-free, and robust than ever. Now, event organizers can enable AI-powered checks for Grammar, Plagiarism, and Overall Quality for abstract submissions. This functionality extends not only to the default title and summary fields but also to any custom textarea fields that you may have in your submission form.

Continue reading

Harnessing the Power of Tags to Streamline Abstract Submissions

Harnessing the Power of Tags

 

It is crucial for university event organizers to efficiently manage abstract submissions for conferences and scientific events. The latest advancement in Dryfta abstract submission system introduces a powerful feature known as “Tags.” This functionality enables organizers to create “stages” and assigning these “tags” or “stages” to abstracts. This article explores how the Tags function enhances the abstract submission process and allows organizers to streamline their workflow effectively.

Continue reading

Still Accepting Abstract Submissions Through Email?

Still Accepting Abstract Submissions Through Email? Get an Abstract Management System

 

Do you still accept abstract submissions through email? If so, we've got bad news: You're probably losing a lot of good data. Even though it's easy to use and free to set up, email is an incredibly inefficient way to handle scientific data. And no matter how hard you try, it's not going to get any better. 

People have trouble submitting their abstracts on time because they have to use email to send them in, which can be slow and unreliable. Email doesn't allow you to track who has submitted and when, either—so there's no way of knowing if someone hasn't sent in their work yet or just hasn't sent it at all!

Also because the number of emails sent per day is increasing at a faster rate than the speed at which our brains can process information. In fact, on average, we receive about 121 emails per day—and spend about 10 hours in total dealing with them!

Takeaway: An actual abstract management system will help keep your conference running smoothly!

Continue reading

What Constitutes a Complete Peer Review System

peer review system

 

The peer-review system has been around as part of the medical scene since the early 1800s. While the peer review system has its fair share of detractors it is still highly regarded in most circles as the best method we have for evaluating academic work.

So, what is a peer review system, and what should it be included to ensure you are delivering a paper or abstract that has the best chance of success?

Continue reading