
If you’re a researcher, you’ve probably submitted abstracts to conferences and wondered how the selection process works. More importantly, you might have questioned, at some point in your journey, if the system is truly fair.
Powerful, Enterprise-Grade Event Management Software
Sell tickets & Collect registration fees online
Full-Service Abstract Management Software: Collect âž© Assign âž© Review âž© Decide âž© Notify
Customizable forms to collect & review abstracts, symposia, proposals & grants
The Complete Event Schedule Builder to Create Virtual & Hybrid Sessions
Create Event Schedule with Slides, Group Chats, Survey forms & more
Engagement Tools to Host Virtual Conferences & Online Community Website
Engage attendees & Produce knowledge with online networking portal
Secure, scalable event management for large enterprises with full data control
Simplify academic conferences and university event management
Powerful tools to manage multiple clients and events seamlessly
Insights and trends on event management and technology
Latest features and improvements in Dryfta
Step by step resources to maximize your event’s potential
Connect Dryfta with your favorite tools and platforms
Real success stories from events powered by Dryfta

If you’re a researcher, you’ve probably submitted abstracts to conferences and wondered how the selection process works. More importantly, you might have questioned, at some point in your journey, if the system is truly fair.

Every conference depends on a fair review system. While reviewers do their best to be objective, small biases still slip in and influence the ultimate decision about whether to accept the abstract. A simple word, a known name, or a familiar topic can shift how a reviewer scores an abstract. Such instances might feel harmless, yet they build up and change who gets accepted.