The Future of Abstract Review: NLP & ML in Academia

Discover NLP and ML The Future of Abstract Review in Academia

The academic landscape has transformed immensely, and the peer-review process is no exception. Every year, there is an increase in the volume of abstract submissions to academic conferences and journals. Behind every review process lies an abstract, which functions as a first impression of the research. It also acts as a summary that helps the reviewers understand whether a paper requires further attention or not.

Continue reading

8 Perks of Using Automation in Abstract Peer Review

8 Perks of Using Automation in Abstract Peer Review

If you’re managing abstract submissions for an academic conference, you know the peer review process can feel like herding cats. Reviewers miss deadlines, authors submit incomplete materials, and you’re stuck sending reminder emails at midnight. Manual peer review management creates bottlenecks that delay your entire conference timeline.

Continue reading

Streamlining Abstract Reviews Through AI Automation

efficient ways AI is transforming abstract review

Pulling together successful academic conferences can be a hassle in itself. Previously, organizers used to collect abstracts manually, assign reviewers, and send emails. Now, artificial intelligence (AI) has brough a paradigm shift in the abstact submission and review process.

AI automates repetitive tasks, helps match reviewers to submissions, and ensures high accuracy in the review process. Continue reading

Abstract Management Made Simple Using Automation

Abstract Management Made Simple: Why Automation Is a Game-Changer

It’s no secret that an academic event planner’s to-do list is ever-growing. Abstract management happens to be one of the many critical aspects of an academic or scientific event. Having access to a reliable abstract management system simplifies collecting, organizing and reviewing abstracts for these events and ensures their success and credibility.

Speaking of abstract management systems, let’s help you get acquainted with Dryfta, our abstract management automation platform.
Continue reading

Triple-Blind Review in Conferences to Ensure Fairness in Research

Triple-Blind Review in Conferences: Ensuring Fairness in Research Evaluation

Peer review is the backbone of academic research, but it’s far from perfect. Even the most conscientious reviewers carry subconscious biases that can influence evaluations. Established researchers or prestigious institutions often receive the benefit of the doubt, while early-career academics struggle to get fair consideration.
Continue reading

Simplifying Submission and Review Processes with New Updates

 

In our ongoing commitment to enhancing the functionality and user experience of our platform, Dryfta is thrilled to introduce a set of impactful updates to our submission and review processes. These new features are designed to provide more control and flexibility for organizers, improve transparency for authors, and streamline the overall workflow.

Continue reading

Auto-Populate Co-Authors in Abstract Submission System via Database Search

New Co-Author Addition Features in Abstract Submission System

 

Collaboration is the cornerstone of any successful research or academic event. Recognizing this, we’re excited to announce a significant update to Dryfta’s Abstract Submission System that makes adding co-authors a breeze. This update introduces new options for submitters to add co-authors either by searching our existing database or by manually entering details, or even both. Let’s explore how this new feature can enhance your abstract management experience.

Continue reading

AI-Powered Quality Checks & Plagiarism Detection for Abstracts

 

AI-Powered Quality Checks & Plagiarism Detection
We are excited to announce a significant update to Dryfta’s abstract management system. This update revolutionizes the way abstract submissions are managed, making the process more streamlined, error-free, and robust than ever. Now, event organizers can enable AI-powered checks for Grammar, Plagiarism, and Overall Quality for abstract submissions. This functionality extends not only to the default title and summary fields but also to any custom textarea fields that you may have in your submission form.

 

Continue reading

Harnessing the Power of Tags to Streamline Abstract Submissions

Harnessing the Power of Tags

 

It is crucial for university event organizers to efficiently manage abstract submissions for conferences and scientific events. The latest advancement in Dryfta abstract submission software introduces a powerful feature known as “Tags.” This functionality enables organizers to create “stages” and assigning these “tags” or “stages” to abstracts. This article explores how the Tags function enhances the abstract submission process and allows organizers to streamline their workflow effectively.

Continue reading

What Constitutes a Complete Peer Review System

peer review system

 

The peer-review system has been around as part of the medical scene since the early 1800s. While the peer review system has its fair share of detractors it is still highly regarded in most circles as the best method we have for evaluating academic work.

So, what is a peer review system, and what should it be included to ensure you are delivering a paper or abstract that has the best chance of success?

Continue reading