10 Abstract Management Software for High-Volume Submissions

Managing abstract submissions has turned into a real operational workload for academic conferences, research summits, and corporate events, especially as submission volume rises and the review timeline shrinks. Abstract management systems exist for exactly this reason. Abstract submission software in 2026 now includes features such as AI-powered scoring, live collaboration, and built-in plagiarism checks. Features that used to feel premium are becoming a baseline for those who require both quality and speed.

Finding the best abstract management software still takes time and effort. There are many available tools, and they all appear similar until you take a closer look at the workflows. So the research is already done here. Below is a curated list of the top 10 abstract management software for handling calls for proposals, speakers, and abstracts.

1. Dryfta

Dryfta’s abstract management software stands out by keeping the full submission and review flow within a broader event system. The platform collects abstracts and research papers, then routes submissions to reviewers for evaluation in a streamlined workflow. Automated email and text notifications also support the process, so you can send updates on submission status and push reminders for late submissions and pending reviews.

Key Features to Consider

• • Multiple Submission Workflows: Dryfta supports multiple submission workflows, allowing you to build different forms for abstracts, symposia, proposals, or grants. You can tailor each form to collect the exact details you need, then set the review steps to match your process. That way, every submission type follows the right path from submission to review to final decision.
  • Self-service Dashboard (for Authors & Reviewers): Authors and reviewers can handle their work through Dryfta’s self-service dashboard. Users can submit materials, track progress, and complete reviews while still seeing important updates and notifications as they come in. The self-service dashboard gives users more control over their own responsibilities, reducing the back-and-forth required for admin support.
  • Automated and Manual Assignments: Event teams can choose between automated and manual assignments depending on how much control they want over the review setup. Automated assignment pairs submissions with reviewers based on criteria you define. Manual assignment is available when a hands-on approach makes more sense.
  • Customizable Review Process with Double Blind: Dryfta lets you customize the full review process, including choosing single blind or double blind review settings. You can shape the review flow to match your event standards.
  • Accept and Notify Authors: Once reviews are complete and decisions are final, Dryfta lets you mark submissions as accepted or rejected and notify authors right away. Notifications can run automatically or be handled manually, depending on your preferred communication management.

2. Oxford Abstracts

Oxford Abstracts is often chosen for its flexibility; thus, it is well-suited for a variety of event types (academic conferences, industry symposia, corporate events). The platform gives you plenty of ways to customize how submissions and reviews work, which is helpful when your criteria aren’t one-size-fits-all. You can adjust submission forms, build the review workflow your way, and set evaluation criteria that match what you are actually trying to assess.

It also does a solid job on usability, especially when you are handling calls for proposals, speakers, or abstracts. Submitters usually get through the process without much confusion, and the admin tools make it easier to manage submissions, assign reviewers, and keep an eye on progress.

Key Features to Consider

• • Flexible submission forms that support different submission types
  • Multi-stage review options with clear control over what submitters see and what reviewers see at each step
  • A dedicated reviewer interface that helps reviewers track assigned submissions and status, so progress stays easy to follow

3. Ex Ordo

Ex Ordo manages all aspects of the abstract submission process and peer review in a highly organized manner. In addition to managing abstracts, it also offers session scheduling, registration, payment, and detailed exports. 

The platform is built to reduce admin workload while keeping the experience streamlined for submitters and reviewers. At its core, Ex Ordo focuses on three main areas: assisting teams in managing their bandwidth and capacity limitations, creating better links between the conference and the overall organizational workflow, and delivering timely and relevant support.

Key Features to Consider

• • Abstract collection tools that let you set topics, presentation formats, and word count limits
  • Support for single-track events as well as multi-track conference setups
  • Automatic reviewer matching for submissions, which helps distribute workload more evenly and speeds up the review assignment step
  • Inbuilt notifications for accepted and rejected submissions

4. OpenWater

OpenWater is an abstract management software commonly used by associations, universities, and professional organizations that handle large volumes of submissions. Common uses include abstract management at conferences, award nominations, and grants.

One of OpenWater’s strongest points is integration, which matters when an organization already runs on a specific membership or CRM setup. The platform integrates with tools like Salesforce and iMIS that help to maintain a consistent level of information across multiple systems and reduce the chance of conflicting records. 

Key Features to Consider

• • Multi-stage review tools that support more than one evaluation step
  • Central dashboards for managing submissions and review status, allowing teams to see what is pending, what is done, and where bottlenecks are building up
  • Session building tools to organize accepted abstracts into a programme

5. EasyChair

EasyChair is widely used for conference management in academic and scientific settings, especially when submission volume gets intense, and the platform needs to stay stable under pressure. The system is designed for workflow setups that are faster than typical PHP and MySQL-based web services. EasyChair is also positioned for mega-conferences, with support for nearly 5,000 submissions, plus the ability to accept over 300 submissions per second. 

Large file uploads are part of the setup too, including video files, supported through high-bandwidth settings. The reason many researchers and scholars prefer EasyChair is the easy-to-use interface with both a simple submission procedure and a structured peer-review workflow.

Key Features to Consider

• • Paper, poster, and panel submissions are supported in the same system
  • Single blind or double blind review options available, depending on how you want identity and anonymity handled
  • Reviewer controls that help account for conflicts of interest, along with more targeted rules when needed

6. Reviewr

Reviewr is designed for events that run calls for proposals, speakers, or abstracts, and just want a clean, reliable way to manage everything in one place. Nothing about the platform is over-complicated. The layout is easy to understand, which helps a lot when you have dozens or even hundreds of people submitting their work and you cannot afford constant support emails. 

The navigation is simple, so neither the author nor the reviewer will have to search for the next button or instructions. Reviewr also includes structured review tools for scoring, comments, and consistent feedback. That keeps evaluations fair and organized, and it helps teams move through review rounds faster.

Key Features to Consider

• • A branded landing page that matches the event theme
  • Submission tracking and management dashboard that keeps key actions and status updates easy to follow
  • Filtering and sorting options for submissions
  • Group setup for reviewers for more targeted assignments

7. Cvent

Cvent offers an enterprise-level abstract management software built for large events where submission volume and data complexity can intensify quickly, especially for global congresses and large academic symposia. The submission portal is highly configurable, so the call for papers process can support features such as multiple authors, richer bios, and a range of media attachments, all within a structured workflow.

Once the review process is complete, Cvent’s integrated session builder helps turn accepted abstracts into an agenda directly. Accepted content can be placed in the conference programme using drag-and-drop scheduling, which helps connect review decisions to agenda planning without extra steps.

Key Features to Consider

• • Invitation, confirmation, and reminder emails handled through automated communication tools
  • Agenda tools for building the programme and publishing it in a structured way
  • Customized forms for submissions and speakers

8. Whova

Whova makes submission and review management feel more straightforward, especially when your goal is to collect forms with minimal setup time. The platform offers quick form configuration and ready-to-use application flows, which can make the abstract process smoother for both your event team and speakers. Whova also supports communication and review coordination in a practical way, helping distribute review tasks across reviewers and keep timelines organized through configurable schedules and deadlines.

Key Features to Consider

• • Set up multiple calls for different needs, including posters, speakers, or general proposals.
  • Confirmation emails can be sent to speakers as part of the workflow, helping lock in attendance details once decisions are made
  • Reuse settings from past calls when launching a new call for speakers

9. Morressier

Morressier is an abstract management software built for high-volume scientific and professional conferences. It puts a lot of effort into making the interface feel modern while still holding up at scale. The platform is described as design-first and is positioned to remain responsive even when handling tens of thousands of abstracts.

Morressier also leans into integrity checks that use AI, which is meant to help editorial teams keep standards consistent while submission volume keeps increasing. The feature set includes automated fraud and plagiarism detection, author ID verification through ORCiD, and AI-generated text checks. 

Key Features to Consider

• • An analytics dashboard for tracking submission volume, progress, and review status
  • Email automation that covers submission invitations, review requests, and decision notifications across the full review cycle
  • Reviewer auto assignment options that route submissions based on rules like expertise, workload, and conflicts

10. vFairs

vFairs offers an abstract management software built for large academic conferences where submission volume can reach thousands, while maintaining a stable workflow. A central dashboard helps track submission status, reviewer progress, and analytics in real time.

A key feature in vFairs is the auto-assignment, which matches abstracts to reviewers based on predefined specialties and tracks, while also considering conflicts of interest you set up. The idea is to keep assignments aligned with expertise and help your evaluation process move at a steady pace. The platform also supports multi-layer review setups, along with double-blind review options.

Key Features to Consider

• • Data-driven insights highlight submission trends and reviewer performance
  • Timely alerts to submitters and reviewers, which reduces delays
  • Multi-stage review workflows support unique scoring rubrics for abstracts and full papers

Looking for the Best Abstract Management Software for Your Event?

Take the time to review your options and weigh the factors that actually matter for your event. A little extra effort during selection usually saves a lot of time later.

While the top 10 abstract management software solutions listed above each bring their own strengths, one stands out for its more complete approach, and that is Dryfta. It goes beyond streamlining submissions and reviews by giving you flexible configuration options, inbuilt communication tools, and a user-friendly interface that supports your entire event workflow. Request a free demo to see how Dryfta can support your event management process in a more consistent way.