How to Choose Reviewers for a Scientific Event

How to Choose Reviewers for a Scientific Event

A scientific event in 2026 will either stand tall or fall short on the basis of a number of different factors. However, of utmost importance and central to the very ethos of science and research itself is the abstract review process. When one organizes a scientific event, the reviewers you select become an inextricable part of your academic standards.

Continue reading

10 Ways Abstract Management System Improves Collaboration Among Reviewers

10 Ways AMS Improves Collaboration Among Reviewers

Reviewer collaboration means experts work together to review the same paper. They share feedback, discuss differences, and agree on a final view of the work. The process often becomes a challenge when teams rely on outdated technology. Many associations still use legacy tools that limit how reviewers share their feedback, assign and track tasks, or stay aligned throughout the review cycle. The outdated systems focus primarily on basic tracking rather than real-time collaboration, thereby decreasing productivity and creating workflow gaps. Continue reading